

About 31% of adults in nonmetropolitan counties and 25% of adults in metropolitan counties reported drinking SSBs one or more times per day.For example, 68% of adults living in the Northeast, 67% of adults living in the South, 61% of adults living in the West, and 59% of adults living in the Midwest reported drinking SSBs one or more times per day.The prevalence of Americans who drink sugary drinks at least once per day differs geographically.Among adults, SSB intake is higher among males, young adults, non-Hispanic Black or Mexican American adults, or adults with low incomes.Among youth, SSB intake is higher among boys, adolescents, non-Hispanic Black youth, or youth in families with low incomes.On average, US youth consumed 143 calories from SSBs and US adults consumed 145 calories from SSBs on a given day. In 2011-2014, 6 in 10 youth (63%) and 5 in 10 adults (49%) drank a sugar-sweetened beverage on a given day.SSB consumption varies by age, sex, race/ethnicity, geography and socioeconomic status.


Frequently drinking sugar-sweetened beverages is associated with weight gain, obesity, type 2 diabetes, heart disease, kidney diseases, non-alcoholic liver disease, tooth decay and cavities, and gout, a type of arthritis. Natural Resources Canada Economics and Industry Nature and Environment Science and Technology Transport Energy Efficiency Cars Light Trucks Buying Fuel Consumption fuel economy Battery-electric vehicles 2012-2022 () CSV Battery-electric vehicles 2012-2022 () CSV Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles 2012-2022 () CSV Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles 2012-2022 () CSV 2022 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2022 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2021 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2021 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2020 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2020 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2019 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2019 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2018 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2018 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2017 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2017 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2016 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2016 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2015 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2015 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2010-2014 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2010-2014 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2005-2009 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2005-2009 Fuel Consumption Ratings () CSV 2000-2004 Fuel Consumption Ratings CSV 2000-2004 Fuel Consumption Ratings CSV 1995-1999 Fuel Consumption Ratings CSV 1995-1999 Fuel Consumption Ratings CSV (Original Fuel Consumption Ratings 2000-2014) CSV (2-cycle).csv (Original Fuel Consumption Ratings 2000-2014) CSV (Original Fuel Consumption Ratings 1995-1999) CSV (2-cycle).csv (Original Fuel Consumption Ratings 1995-1999) CSV ĭatasets provide model-specific fuel consumption ratings and estimated carbon dioxide emissions for new light-duty vehicles for retail sale in Canada.Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) or sugary drinks are leading sources of added sugars in the American diet. To compare the fuel consumption information of new and older models to find the most fuel-efficient vehicle that meets your everyday needs, use the fuel consumption ratings search tool at. Note that these are approximate values that were generated from the original ratings, not from vehicle testing.įor more information on fuel consumption testing, visit. To help you compare vehicles from different model years, the fuel consumption ratings for 1995 to 2014 vehicles have been adjusted to reflect the improved testing that is more representative of everyday driving. Fuel consumption ratings Datasets provide model-specific fuel consumption ratings and estimated carbon dioxide emissions for new light-duty vehicles for retail sale in Canada.
